Banner Viadrina

Betreute Dissertationen

Abgeschlossene Dissertationen

Ulrike Ehling

Ehling Diss ©Springer

Maité Kersaint

Kersaint Diss ©Kersaint

Christina Minniberger

Minniberger Diss ©Nomos

Mitja Sienknecht

Sienknecht Diss ©S

Jasmin Siedentopp

Siedentopp Diss ©Nomos

 Esther Pieterse

Pieterse Diss ©Cuvillier


Laufende Dissertationen

Anna Görg
Titel: Geöffnete Grenzen für niedrigqualifizierte Arbeitsimmigration. Eine QCA-Studie zu Determinanten migrationspolitischer Entscheidungsprozesse


Niedrigqualifizierte Arbeitsimmigration in den Niedriglohnsektor ist in westlichen Demokratien die umstrittenste und oft am stärksten limitierte Form der Einwanderung. Doch trotz wiederkehrenden, hitzigen öffentlichen Debatten um „Wirtschaftsflüchtlinge“ und „Einwanderung in die Sozialsysteme“ entscheiden sich Regierungen immer wieder für Einreise- und Arbeitsmöglichkeiten, die auf eben jene Gruppe von Migrant*innen abzielen, wie z.B. Gastarbeiter*innen- oder Saisonarbeiter*innen-Programme. Dabei bestehen oft recht unterschiedliche institutionelle, wirtschaftliche und kulturelle Kontexte, in denen sich Politiker*innen für diese vermeintlich unerwünschte Form der Immigration entscheiden.

Wie trotz variierender Bedingungen das gleiche Ergebnis erzielt wird, kann in der Forschung zu Migrationspolitik bislang theoretisch nicht erklärt werden. In der aktuellen Forschung zu migrationspolitischen Entscheidungen wird deutlich, dass sowohl institutionelle, interessensbasierte und politisch-kulturelle Aspekte hier eine Rolle spielen. Doch wo in diesem Politikbereich die Schwerpunkte liegen, welche Sphäre einflussreich ist und welche nicht, ist ungewiss.

Diese Dissertation setzt sich zum Ziel, diese Lücke mittels einer Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) zu schließen. Hierfür werden entsprechende Gesetzesakte der OECD-Staaten im Zeitraum 2008 bis 2017 anhand institutioneller, interessensbasierter und politisch-kultureller Bedingungen untersucht.

Beginn: 10/2016

Peter Ulrich
Titel: Participatory Governance in the Europe of the (cross-border) Regions
Cross-border, transnational and interregional cooperation of subnational entities within the European Union have been strengthened politically, legally and financially by the EU and the Council of Europe. Nearly every border region in the EU participates in some form of cooperation structure across borders – mainly due to financial support by the EU joint initiative INTERREG. In general, these Europeanization effects of regional administrative integration have been described by scholars using neofunctionalist (multilevel governance) and intergovernmentalist approaches highlighting the cooperation rationale of cross-border actors.
The aim of the research project is to go a step ahead following a conceptual shift towards a normative - participatory approach of (cross-border) regional integration. On the basis of the EU legal instrument European Grouping of territorial cooperation (EGTC), processes of re-scaling, re-territorialization and paradiplomacy in a “Europe of the territories” will be analyzed with regard to inclusiveness and modes of subnational participatory governance.
In general, policy-making and strategic development of the EU regional policy, particularly the European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) are products of a successive bargaining and functional technocratic regulation between the administrative elites within the EU multilevel (supranational, national, subnational) polity excluding the local community. The aim of the research project is thus to elaborate forms and channels of transborder participatory governance in EU transnational spaces and to examine pre-conditions for the establishment of an increased inclusion of a cross-border citizenship. Moreover, it focuses on the problems and obstacles of the institutionalization of deliberative and participatory mechanisms of a subnational citizenship in a postnational multilevel arena.  Finally, the research - that is based on four case studies - analyzes to what extent the EGTC foster both the consolidation of cross-border cooperation and institutionalization of transnational participation on a subnational level.
Beginn: 01/2014

Linda Walter
Titel: Networked Empathy - The Social Web as Enabler for Universal Human Rights
Over the last decades human rights often served as all-purpose weapon for justification and condemnation of political decision-making and individual behavior. However, despite their prominent role, human rights are violated as much as ever. The research project focuses on this contradiction and aims to understand and resolve it by focusing on the individual level of human rights and the role, the social web can play in changing moral judgment.
In a first step it is argued that the reasons for the high number of human rights violations despite a political unanimous condemnation can be found in the fact that the unanimity is only a theoretical political one based on deliberative rational argumentation – it is not taking into account the individual human being with its emotional and social nature. Based on Jonathan Haidt’s “Social Inuitionist Model” it is stated that moral judgments (the basis for a supportive attitude towards human rights) are based on emotional intuition and social context and not on rational argumentation.
Consequently, to change moral judgments in favor of human rights, it is necessary to focus on emotional storytelling and social interaction on an individual basis. The functionality of the social web is based exactly on these patterns. Structurally, individuals use the social web to strengthen and prolong connections to acquaintances. With regard to contents, individuals share personal experiences and emotional stories. Consequently, the social web is the port of call for a social intuitionist human rights education.
Beginn: 05/2013

Luana Martin-Russu

Titel: The Limts of Post-Accession Europeanization – The Judicial Reform and the Fight against Corruption in Romania since January 2007 
Through its policy of conditionality the European Union places high priority on the fight against corruption. Romania and Bulgaria are subject to post-accession conditionality, a mechanism expected to bring about lasting judicial reform and democratic consolidation in the two member states. Yet, an analysis of Romania’s compliance record in matters such as justice and anti-corruption after January 2007, illustrates the reversibility of reforms. The present project aims to uncover the reasons for Romania’s post-accession setback. It hypothesizes that the elite’s instrumental use of the democratic institutional framework for individual purposes alters the course of anti-corruption reform. The study proposes thus a redefinition of the factors triggering change both in the post-accession as well as in the pre-accession period. 
The theoretical argument builds on the top-down rational institutionalist logic of consequentialism and develops a revised model according to which the process of de-Europeanization strongly depends on the domestic context and in particular on the personal interests pursued by the domestic political elite. What is novel about this adapted model is that it brings into sharper focus the domestic political elite, its structure, circulation patterns and preferences, conceptualizing the impetus for reform as a self-serving opportunistic behavior. 
The project addresses the causal link between the course of reform in Romania and the personal interests pursued by the members of the domestic political elite. In their pursuit of personal benefits, the members of the elite misuse the democratic framework for individual purposes, thus making meaningful reform virtually impossible. The level of fragmentation within the elite group and the constraints posed by the civil society are emphasized as two crucial variables . A strong self-interested political elite can impede reform in pursuit of personal benefits if no significant constraints are posed by the civil society. 
The above prediction is rendered plausible by using two in-depth case-studies on Romania’s anti-corruption and environmental reform. The empirical analysis will offer a comparison between a case of successful Europeanization and an instance of post-accession legislative setback, explaining the latter by showing the considerable extent to which the members of the political elite act on their own personal interest, thereby making any meaningful reform impossible.
Beginn: 10/2010


<<< zurück zu Forschung